Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Florida

Miami Florida Facility

Miami, FL · ~111 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Miami Florida Facility runs at 473% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Miami Florida Facility: 15.6 TCR = 473% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Miami Florida Facility safety composite

Miami Florida Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2020→2022

Miami Florida Facility injury rate improved

Miami Florida Facility's TCR fell 2.1 from 16.6 in 2020 to 14.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=16.6 · 2022=14.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Miami, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 473% of ind

  • DART 14.6 DART
  • RANK #19/19
  • PHOTO Kansas City Distribu…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kansas City Distribution (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Miami Florida Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Miami Florida Facility averages 15.6 TCR (473% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Miami Florida Facility TCR series: 2020=16.6 · 2022=14.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Miami Florida Facility falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 19 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in Florida.

Miami Florida Facility (111 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Miami Florida Facility
Miami Florida Facility (111 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Miami Florida Facility has fewer employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.6 14.6 5 0 0
2020 16.6 16.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · FL · Miami

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kansas City Distribution 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suiza Dairy Corporation Aguadilla 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Dairy Inc 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Farms Dairy - Carlinville 16.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE WPB 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSN-Sanford Plant 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE TLC Diversified Inc 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miami Steel Erectors Inc 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR McCoys Building Supply- Midland 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01710 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 210208-Amite Po 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Coast Fence, Inc. 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE OmniMax International Inc 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diana's Mexican Food Products, INC 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaver Transportation - Shop 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #604 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.