STATE GOVERNMENT · Michigan

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva

Battle Creek, MI · ~59 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical STATE GOVERNMENT workplace, earning a grade C.

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva: 4.0 TCR = 106% of STATE GOVERNMENT BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva safety composite

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2016→2024

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva injury rate improved

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva's TCR fell 7.3 from 7.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=4.0 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Battle Creek, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 106% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/44
  • PHOTO Cutler Pond
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cutler Pond (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva averages 4.0 TCR (106% of the STATE GOVERNMENT BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=4 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva falls in its industry

560 STATE GOVERNMENT establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 44 STATE GOVERNMENT employers in Michigan.

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva (59 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva
Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva (59 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Mich Youth Chllnge Acad - Dmva has fewer employees than the STATE GOVERNMENT median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 9.2 7.3 5 0 0
2019 7.8 7.8 4 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2016 7.3 7.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · MI · Battle Creek

560 STATE GOVERNMENT employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 161 employers in Battle Creek, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cutler Pond 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpine House 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Board of Child Care- DC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sipe's Orchard Home 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smart Vision Lights 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4066_7855 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Traverse County Road Commission 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metropolitan Concrete Corp. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Denso Manufacturing of Michigan 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRONSON BATTLE CREEK 1,530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Battle Creek HQ Corporate Office 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR I I Stanley Co., Inc. 729 FTE
NAT-TCR Dfa-Cdl-Bridgeton Nj-Plant 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Gertrudes Health Rehab 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Addington Place of Stuart 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin States Marketing Co., Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tropical Roofing Products 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evangeline Home Health LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE TAO Industries dba Hawk Construction 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARC Logistix, LLC 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.