Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · North Carolina

Sipe's Orchard Home

Conover, NC · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sipe's Orchard Home runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade C.

Sipe's Orchard Home: 4.0 TCR = 105% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sipe's Orchard Home safety composite

Sipe's Orchard Home scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sipe's Orchard Home held a steady TCR band

Sipe's Orchard Home's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Conover, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 105% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/14
  • PHOTO Alpine House
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alpine House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sipe's Orchard Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sipe's Orchard Home averages 4.0 TCR (105% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sipe's Orchard Home TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Sipe's Orchard Home falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 14 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in North Carolina.

Sipe's Orchard Home (32 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sipe's Orchard Home
Sipe's Orchard Home (32 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Sipe's Orchard Home has fewer employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 6.4 3.2 2 0 0
2021 6.2 0.0 2 0 0
2020 9.2 0.0 3 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2018 7.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · NC · Conover

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 95 employers in Conover, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alpine House 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MICH YOUTH CHLLNGE ACAD - DMVA 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEW ALTERNATIVES, INC - ESU 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cutler Pond 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.C. Smith Produce Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zenith - Conover 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4224 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4224 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2510 Conover Folding 309 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express & Suites Duluth North Miller Hill 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 3152 Lkq 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Blanski Energy Management, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sedwall Manufacturing Company 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arcadia 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landes Trucking 72005 Port Barre 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE PFC-OH 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blaylock Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.