House framing · New Jersey

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc.

Toms River, NJ · ~84 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical House framing workplace, earning a grade C.

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 87% of House framing BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. safety composite

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 5.0 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Toms River, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 87% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Viking Construction …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Viking Construction Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (87% of the House framing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. falls in its industry

387 House framing establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 House framing employers in New Jersey.

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. (84 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc.
Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. (84 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. has more employees than the House framing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 1.2 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2017 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · NJ · Toms River

387 House framing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 115 employers in Toms River, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Viking Construction Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tristar Carpentry, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Klark Organization I, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Horizon Carpentry Inc 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE prysmian group 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Edison 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allspec Construction, Inc. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novel 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Medical Center 2,848 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shoprite of Fischer Bay 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Jersey Behavioral Health 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital Of Toms River 391 FTE
NAT-TCR RD Rubber Technology Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Marc Glassman Inc 74WO 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aludyne Georgia Machining 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6206 Fairfield Ct 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clorox Cleaning & Household Mfg 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Verasa Management LLC 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE 57218 Puerto Rico 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbian Trading 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.