Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing · California

RD Rubber Technology Corporation

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RD Rubber Technology Corporation runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

RD Rubber Technology Corporation: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RD Rubber Technology Corporation safety composite

RD Rubber Technology Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2024

RD Rubber Technology Corporation injury rate improved

RD Rubber Technology Corporation's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.6 · 2018=3.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Santa Fe Springs, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/18
  • PHOTO Prospira America Cor…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prospira America Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

RD Rubber Technology Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RD Rubber Technology Corporation averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RD Rubber Technology Corporation TCR series: 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where RD Rubber Technology Corporation falls in its industry

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 18 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., employers in California.

RD Rubber Technology Corporation (30 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate RD Rubber Technology Corporation
RD Rubber Technology Corporation (30 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

RD Rubber Technology Corporation has fewer employees than the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prospira America Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bates Rubber 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elbex Corp. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Materials : Ligonier 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BZNUR 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1780 San Juan Rd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Oaks 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfields Turf, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Aludyne Georgia Machining 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6206 Fairfield Ct 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Marc Glassman Inc 74WO 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE IHD Powdercoat Services Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montal-Inc-Montgomery,Al - Alabama 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waxahachie 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rivercrest Place Assisted Living 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.