Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · California

Michaels Distribution Center #1824

Lancaster, CA · ~418 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michaels Distribution Center #1824 runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade D.

Michaels Distribution Center #1824: 7.6 TCR = 131% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michaels Distribution Center #1824 safety composite

Michaels Distribution Center #1824 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2017→2018

Michaels Distribution Center #1824 injury rate improved

Michaels Distribution Center #1824's TCR fell 3.7 from 9.4 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.4 · 2018=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.6 · 131% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #870/1131
  • PHOTO FC: Stockton
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~418 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FC: Stockton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Michaels Distribution Center #1824 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michaels Distribution Center #1824 averages 7.6 TCR (131% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michaels Distribution Center #1824 TCR series: 2017=9.4 · 2018=5.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Michaels Distribution Center #1824 falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #870 safest of 1131 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in California.

Michaels Distribution Center #1824 (418 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Michaels Distribution Center #1824
Michaels Distribution Center #1824 (418 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Michaels Distribution Center #1824 has more employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.8 2.5 20 1 0
2017 9.4 3.3 37 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Lancaster

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FC: Stockton 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 179 STATESVILLE NC 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30260 CAPSTONE - ADUSA DC20 DISPUTANTA VA (DRY) 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF2 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andersen and Sons Shelling 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE Armorcast Products Company 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE Griswold Industries 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips Industries 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR Liberty Residential - Glen 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandvik ADC 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Trailer Sales Plant 6 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR All Ways Electric Corp 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TX-Dallas-Operating Center 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ransom Memorial Hospital 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE Siemens Industry Incorporated 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE Happy Floors 418 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.