Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing · South Carolina

Michelin Tweel Technologies

Piedmont, SC · ~103 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michelin Tweel Technologies runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Michelin Tweel Technologies: 1.3 TCR = 41% of Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michelin Tweel Technologies safety composite

Michelin Tweel Technologies scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Michelin Tweel Technologies: 1.8 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 3.63× in 2024

Michelin Tweel Technologies's TCR rose 3.1 from 1.8 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326211 · Piedmont, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 41% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #8/19
  • PHOTO Michelin US1
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Michelin US1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Michelin Tweel Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michelin Tweel Technologies averages 1.3 TCR (41% of the Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michelin Tweel Technologies TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Michelin Tweel Technologies falls in its industry

114 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-p establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 19 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-p employers in South Carolina.

Michelin Tweel Technologies (103 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Michelin Tweel Technologies
Michelin Tweel Technologies (103 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Michelin Tweel Technologies has fewer employees than the Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2023 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326211 · SC · Piedmont

114 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 71 employers in Piedmont, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Michelin US1 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Industries 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aiken ORR (BAMG) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR US2 Sandy Springs Facility 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Electric Operations Building (Charleston) 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Walls Inc-Columbia 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulbrandsen Chemicals - Orangeburg Facility 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkway Products Seneca South Carolina 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drive Automotive Industries of America 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Blood Connection 657 FTE
CITY-NEAR PL Developments - OGR Plant 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR C453 Greenville 372 FTE
NAT-TCR VT - Essex - 30 Gauthier Dr - Keurig Green Mountain Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Village Nursing Center 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR First Call Environmental 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Architectural Components Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dean Technology, Inc. 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crisp Industries, Inc 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 118 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deer Park Roofing LLC 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.