Agricultural organizations (except youth farming organizations, farm granges) · Michigan

Michigan Agricultural Commodities

Breckenridge, MI · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Agricultural Commodities runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agricultural organizations (except youth farming organizations, farm granges) workplace, earning a grade D.

Michigan Agricultural Commodities: 3.8 TCR = 179% of Agricultural organizations (except youth farming organizations, farm granges) BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Agricultural Commodities safety composite

Michigan Agricultural Commodities scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2018→2023

Michigan Agricultural Commodities injury rate improved

Michigan Agricultural Commodities's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813910 · Breckenridge, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 179% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Monat Global Corp
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monat Global Corp (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Agricultural Commodities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Agricultural Commodities averages 3.8 TCR (179% of the Agricultural organizations (except youth farming organizations, farm granges) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan Agricultural Commodities TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Michigan Agricultural Commodities falls in its industry

50 Agricultural organizations (ex establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Agricultural organizations (ex employers in Michigan.

Michigan Agricultural Commodities (28 employees, TCR 3.8) among 28 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 29 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Agricultural Commodities
Michigan Agricultural Commodities (28 employees, TCR 3.8) among 28 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Michigan Agricultural Commodities has fewer employees than the Agricultural organizations (except youth median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2018 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813910 · MI · Breckenridge

50 Agricultural organizations (except youth farming organizations, farm granges) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 employers in Breckenridge, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Monat Global Corp 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaleida Health 1028 Main Street 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glas-Col, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Republic Services 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hamlin Farms 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crossroads Dairy 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Traverse Assembly DBA Grand Traverse Pallet 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zeeland Generation 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR IFABM 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Breckenridge 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kalmbach Feeds of Michigan, LLC 16 FTE
NAT-TCR Dutch-Way Farm Market Schaefferstown 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte Pipe and Foundry 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingspan Insulated Panels Modesto 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Techmer PM CA 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Azalea Commons of Batesville 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oxford Farms, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Milwaukee 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howden Americas 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.