Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Michigan

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo

Portage, MI · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo: 0.9 TCR = 42% of Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo safety composite

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo held a steady TCR band

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Portage, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/114
  • PHOTO Iron Range Service C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iron Range Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Cat Kalamazoo averages 0.9 TCR (42% of the Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Michigan Cat Kalamazoo falls in its industry

2,560 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 114 Construction machinery and equ employers in Michigan.

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo (29 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Cat Kalamazoo
Michigan Cat Kalamazoo (29 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Michigan Cat Kalamazoo has fewer employees than the Construction machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MI · Portage

2,560 Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 136 employers in Portage, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iron Range Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Compressed Air Equipment, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concentric, LLC Carrollton 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cross Implement Inc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (IN) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Hart 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riveridge Cider 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Covert Generating Company 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Instruments - 1941 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Medical 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summit Polymers, Inc. 1,619 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Corporation Shared Services 768 FTE
NAT-TCR DSM Biomedical - Pennsylvania Drive Site 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Industrial Contractors Corporate 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cobham Semiconductor Solutions - Colorado Springs 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DFW Airport 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE FLV 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydroblasters Wisc. Rapids 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Lighting & Signalization LLC 155 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE ALS of North Carolina LLC 152 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.