Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Michigan

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing

Name: Michigan Caterpillar Lansing Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Lansing, MI · ~89 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 1.8
Avg TCR: 2.1
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing: 1.8 TCR = 85% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing safety composite

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Lansing, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.8 · 85% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #37/114
PHOTO 23-Colby
BOOK 4y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 23-Colby (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.8
23-Colby

1.8
MOSCWest

1.8
Hussmann Servi

1.8
Michigan Cater

1.8

What this shows Michigan Caterpillar Lansing averages 1.8 TCR (85% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2 · 2024=2 · BLS 2.1

Where Michigan Caterpillar Lansing falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 114 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Michigan.

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing (89 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Michigan Caterpillar Lansing has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2024	2.0	0.0	2
2023	2.0	0.0	2
2022	3.2	1.1	3
2021	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MI · Lansing

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	23-Colby	COLBY, KS	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MOSCWest	ST. JOSEPH, MO	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hussmann Services Corporation - Salem	SALEM, NH	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Michigan Caterpillar Metro South	BROWNSTOWN, MI	1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	West Branch SC	WEST BRANCH	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	City of Kalamazoo-Public Services-Harrison	KALAMAZOO	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Balkema Excavating, Inc	KALAMAZOO	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	28_22	HOLLAND	89 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lansing Delta Township Assembly	Lansing	2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR	General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly	Lansing	2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR	LCC - Main	Lansing	2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lansing Grand River Assembly	Lansing	1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR	Pfund Construction, Inc	Edwardsville, IL	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Premier Processing, LLC	Wichita, KS	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Core Industrial Maintenance	Mt. Vernon, AL	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bartow Center	Bartow, FL	1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Iowa Steel & Wire Inc.	Centerville, IA	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hormann LLC - Montgomery	Montgomery, IL	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Recovery Village at Columbus	Groveport, OH	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Recovery Village Cherry Hill	Cherry Hill, NJ	89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.