Public probation offices · Michigan

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation

Troy, MI · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Public probation offices workplace, earning a grade B.

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Public probation offices BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation safety composite

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation held a steady TCR band

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922150 · Troy, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/15
  • PHOTO Minnesota Department…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minnesota Department of Corrections - Community Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Public probation offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation falls in its industry

81 Public probation offices establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 15 Public probation offices employers in Michigan.

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation (43 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation
Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation (43 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Michigan Department of Corrections - Troy Probation has fewer employees than the Public probation offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922150 · MI · Troy

81 Public probation offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 237 employers in Troy, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Department of Corrections - Community Services 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KGPO KINGMAN PROBATION 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPSCS DPP East Region 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 252518-DET-NORTHWESTERN STA 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE BB Masonry, Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dort Plants 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gardenview Assisted Living and Memory Care 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-309 5,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Troy - Maple Road 1,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy - Maple Road 1,361 FTE
NAT-TCR FXI - San Leandro 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR YMCA of Western North Carolina Corporate Office 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PPDC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Virgina American Water - Alexandria District 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mereen Johnson LLC Webster SD 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Clairsville Ohio 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rhoads Industries - B57 Fab 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food Source 703-Sacramento 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.