Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel · Michigan

Michigan Seamless Tube

South Lyon, MI · ~182 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Seamless Tube runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade B.

Michigan Seamless Tube: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Seamless Tube safety composite

Michigan Seamless Tube scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2022→2024

Michigan Seamless Tube injury rate improved

Michigan Seamless Tube's TCR fell 1.5 from 3.1 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.1 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · South Lyon, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #2/16
  • PHOTO Kinedyne DBA ELT
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~182 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kinedyne DBA ELT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Seamless Tube in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Seamless Tube averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan Seamless Tube TCR series: 2022=3.1 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Michigan Seamless Tube falls in its industry

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 16 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder employers in Michigan.

Michigan Seamless Tube (182 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Seamless Tube
Michigan Seamless Tube (182 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Michigan Seamless Tube has more employees than the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2022 3.1 2.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MI · South Lyon

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 19 employers in South Lyon, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kinedyne DBA ELT 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLM Steel Tubes 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welspun 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berg Spiral pipe 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Devon Industrial Group 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nutrilite Spaulding Plant 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEKISUI Voltek, LLC 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Lyon Community Schools - 63240 1,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vector Group LLC 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00639 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00366 113 FTE
NAT-TCR Medicalodges Coffeyville on Midland 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4802 East Van Buren 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pataskala - 131 Heritage Drive 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sumitomo Machinery Corp of America Chesapeake 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Madison County Sheriff's Department 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Harrisonburg Transportation (Admin) 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burlington Wi - 3212 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clybourn Il - 3092 182 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.