Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Missouri

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot

Saint Louis, MO · ~37 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot: 3.2 TCR = 98% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot safety composite

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot: 4.7 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.07× in 2024

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot's TCR rose 2.0 from 4.7 in 2019 to 6.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Saint Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 98% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #5/16
  • PHOTO SRG Global - Farming…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SRG Global - Farmington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot averages 3.2 TCR (98% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot TCR series: 2019=4.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=4 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 16 Electroplating metals and form employers in Missouri.

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot (37 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot
Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot (37 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot has fewer employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 6.7 3 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MO · Saint Louis

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 448 employers in Saint Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SRG Global - Farmington 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rittman 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson Avenue 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR De Nora Tech, LLC 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations West 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Dorsett 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Geraldine 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Geraldine District 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR MO002 12,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barnes-Jewish Hospital 9,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL ST LOUIS 5,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR Checkerboard Square 3,464 FTE
NAT-TCR SA Automotive LTD (Reno, NV) 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Technologies - Stow 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Henderson Ice Cream Plant 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AP Linens Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwin Pro Turf, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cashsaver #75 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lead Building Company LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tools and Accessories Corp. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.