Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · Ohio

Regency Technologies - Stow

Stow, OH · ~212 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Technologies - Stow runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Regency Technologies - Stow: 3.2 TCR = 147% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Technologies - Stow safety composite

Regency Technologies - Stow scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2019→2024

Regency Technologies - Stow injury rate improved

Regency Technologies - Stow's TCR fell 2.5 from 4.2 in 2019 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.2 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Stow, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.2 · 147% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #35/79
  • PHOTO FPT Schlafer Divisio…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FPT Schlafer Division, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Regency Technologies - Stow in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Technologies - Stow averages 3.2 TCR (147% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Technologies - Stow TCR series: 2019=4.2 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Regency Technologies - Stow falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 79 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in Ohio.

Regency Technologies - Stow (212 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Technologies - Stow
Regency Technologies - Stow (212 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Regency Technologies - Stow has more employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 4 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 6 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 9 0 0
2021 1.6 1.2 4 0 0
2020 5.8 4.2 11 0 0
2019 4.2 2.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · OH · Stow

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 82 employers in Stow, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FPT Schlafer Division, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fortune Metal Midwest 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR All American Recycling - Chicago 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Recycling Technologies - Burbank Ave 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger Westcon Canton OH - BSL 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&J Pepsi- Franklin Furnace 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burrows - Franklin 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Momentive Performance Materials 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bermex, Inc 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACRT Services 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2323 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2323 353 FTE
NAT-TCR SA Automotive LTD (Reno, NV) 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Microfinish IPC, LLC-Gratiot 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AP Linens Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Locust Grove Village 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cosmos Corporation 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE New York 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2008 - Fresno 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Furniture Company 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.