Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Florida

Microtyping Systems

Pompano Beach, FL · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Microtyping Systems runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Microtyping Systems: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Microtyping Systems safety composite

Microtyping Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2018

Microtyping Systems injury rate improved

Microtyping Systems's TCR fell 2.0 from 3.7 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Pompano Beach, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO ARDx Scarborough
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARDx Scarborough (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Microtyping Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Microtyping Systems averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Microtyping Systems TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Microtyping Systems falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Blood derivative in-vitro diag employers in Florida.

Microtyping Systems (61 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Microtyping Systems
Microtyping Systems (61 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Microtyping Systems has fewer employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2016 3.7 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · FL · Pompano Beach

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 322 employers in Pompano Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARDx Scarborough 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HDx-OH 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maine Standards Company, LLC. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeast Svc Cntr & S 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocala Operations 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE KB Home - Tampa Division Office 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point Blank Enterprises Inc. 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZFTL 685 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Knox Village of Florida 628 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - POMPANO BEACH 38111 591 FTE
NAT-TCR Kearney - 30 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Health Network of Wheeling 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Altru Business Center 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Murfreeesboro MUR 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Terex Services - Waukesha 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE BRE 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hebron, Ky Branch 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheatland Manor 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.