Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Symphony at Stuart

Stuart, FL · ~61 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Symphony at Stuart runs at 418% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Symphony at Stuart: 15.9 TCR = 418% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Symphony at Stuart safety composite

Symphony at Stuart scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2019→2024

Symphony at Stuart injury rate improved

Symphony at Stuart's TCR fell 0.9 from 9.5 in 2019 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 38.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.5 · 2020=20.5 · 2021=16.0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=38.5 · 2024=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Stuart, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.9 · 418% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #367/396
  • PHOTO Merrimack Place
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Merrimack Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Symphony at Stuart in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Symphony at Stuart averages 15.9 TCR (418% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Symphony at Stuart TCR series: 2019=9.5 · 2020=20.5 · 2021=16 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=38.5 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Symphony at Stuart falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #367 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Symphony at Stuart (61 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Symphony at Stuart
Symphony at Stuart (61 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Symphony at Stuart has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 6.2 6 1 0
2023 38.5 5.5 7 0 0
2022 2.1 0.0 1 1 0
2021 16.0 1.1 7 8 0
2020 20.5 11.6 1 15 0
2019 9.5 5.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Stuart

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 138 employers in Stuart, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Merrimack Place 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living - Flagstaff 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - Hillcrest 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fircrest Senior Living 15.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeast Svc Cntr & S 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocala Operations 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE KB Home - Tampa Division Office 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2160 SE Ocean Blvd Bldg. 2 (Thrift Shop) (TCH5) 4,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Memorial Health Systems Inc 4,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR CC MARTIN HEALTH 1,836 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuCO2, LLC 1,136 FTE
NAT-TCR Senske Lawn and Tree Care - Idaho Falls Branch 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Valley Training Center, RAPID South 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Merrimack Place 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne Brown Correctional Facility 15.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cove Electric, Inc 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mill City Senior Living 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dhi Cooperative 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE CBSI Forestville 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.