Organ donor centers, body · Missouri

Mid America Transplant

St. Louis, MO · ~226 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid America Transplant runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Organ donor centers, body workplace, earning a grade D.

Mid America Transplant: 6.6 TCR = 173% of Organ donor centers, body BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid America Transplant safety composite

Mid America Transplant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Mid America Transplant injury rate improved

Mid America Transplant's TCR fell 1.3 from 5.1 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621991 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 173% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/55
  • PHOTO Elkhart, IN-Biolife …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 102 inj
  • SIZE ~226 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elkhart, IN-Biolife 618 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Mid America Transplant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid America Transplant averages 6.6 TCR (173% of the Organ donor centers, body BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid America Transplant TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Mid America Transplant falls in its industry

1,713 Organ donor centers, body establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 55 Organ donor centers, body employers in Missouri.

Mid America Transplant (226 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid America Transplant
Mid America Transplant (226 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Mid America Transplant has more employees than the Organ donor centers, body median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 0.0 12 0 0
2023 5.4 0.4 11 4 0
2022 5.3 0.0 10 1 0
2021 6.2 1.0 13 0 0
2020 7.6 1.0 15 0 0
2019 8.4 1.4 12 0 0
2018 9.9 0.0 10 0 0
2017 7.5 1.4 11 0 0
2016 5.1 1.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621991 · MO · St. Louis

1,713 Organ donor centers, body employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elkhart, IN-Biolife 618 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greensboro, NC-Biolife 855 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Peters, MO- BioLife 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIREDF-OPI-REDFORD 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AZZ Switchgear Systems 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 109 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - WMO2 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE MERCY REHABILITATION HOSPITAL ST LOUIS 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR PIE 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Maine Course Hospitality Group - Courtyard Portland Downtown/Waterfront 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Marshes of Skidaway Island 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PSI Office 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Ambulance 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eden Prairie 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burnett Dairy Cooperative 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plantation Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 226 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.