Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) · Montana

Mid-Rivers Communications

Glendive, MT · ~136 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid-Rivers Communications runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Mid-Rivers Communications: 1.5 TCR = 209% of Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS 0.7 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid-Rivers Communications safety composite

Mid-Rivers Communications scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2018→2021

Mid-Rivers Communications injury rate improved

Mid-Rivers Communications's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Glendive, MT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.5 · 209% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P47
  • PHOTO Ritter Communication…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ritter Communications - Harrison (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Mid-Rivers Communications in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid-Rivers Communications averages 1.5 TCR (209% of the Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid-Rivers Communications TCR series: 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Mid-Rivers Communications falls in its industry

537 Internet service providers, us establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Mid-Rivers Communications (136 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid-Rivers Communications
Mid-Rivers Communications (136 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Mid-Rivers Communications has fewer employees than the Internet service providers, using own op median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 0.7 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · MT · Glendive

537 Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 19 employers in Glendive, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ritter Communications - Harrison 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GCI Communication Corp. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300 Columbus Cir Suite I 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingfisher 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Daily's Premium Meats, LLC 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLACKHAWK 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2608 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4054-000000035 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glendive Medical Center 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glendive Medical Center - Hospital 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABS-0030-0030-04023 FAC-04023-GLENDIVE-MT 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4054-ABS-0030-0030-04023 84 FTE
NAT-TCR Shiseido Americas Distribution Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR D&H Refrigeration, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Howard's Excavating & Paving 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MSD Building Corp. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hayashi Telempu North America KY Plant 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott at the University of Dayton 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pearson Construction llc 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allisonville Meadows 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.