Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Michigan

Midland Cogeneration Venture

Midland, MI · ~101 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midland Cogeneration Venture runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade B.

Midland Cogeneration Venture: 0.7 TCR = 56% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midland Cogeneration Venture safety composite

Midland Cogeneration Venture scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Midland Cogeneration Venture injury rate improved

Midland Cogeneration Venture's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Midland, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.7 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/24
  • PHOTO Kendall Energy Facil…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kendall Energy Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Midland Cogeneration Venture in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midland Cogeneration Venture averages 0.7 TCR (56% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midland Cogeneration Venture TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Midland Cogeneration Venture falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 24 Electric power generation, fos employers in Michigan.

Midland Cogeneration Venture (101 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Midland Cogeneration Venture
Midland Cogeneration Venture (101 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Midland Cogeneration Venture has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MI · Midland

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 135 employers in Midland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kendall Energy Facility 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greene County Steam Plant - APC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greens Bayou 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG - Cedar Bayou 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Battle Creek SC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM & Sons, Inc. 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2683_5121 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Auburn Hills MI Branch 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Chemical - Great Lakes Bay Region Corporate Facilities 3,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR MyMichigan Medical Center Midland 2,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center - Midland 2,348 FTE
NAT-TCR Lonza Bend Inc, 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Site Contractor 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 02239 - Store 02239 Surfside Beach 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dream Downtown 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Family Farms 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Super Giant Landover 774 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 765 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.