Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway · Michigan

Midland County Road Commission

Sanford, MI · ~46 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midland County Road Commission runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway workplace, earning a grade D.

Midland County Road Commission: 4.5 TCR = 160% of Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midland County Road Commission safety composite

Midland County Road Commission scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2016→2024

Midland County Road Commission injury rate improved

Midland County Road Commission's TCR fell 8.1 from 12.8 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.8 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Sanford, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 160% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #61/139
  • PHOTO Roanoke, TX
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roanoke, TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Midland County Road Commission in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midland County Road Commission averages 4.5 TCR (160% of the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midland County Road Commission TCR series: 2016=12.8 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Midland County Road Commission falls in its industry

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 139 Repair, highway, road, street, employers in Michigan.

Midland County Road Commission (46 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Midland County Road Commission
Midland County Road Commission (46 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Midland County Road Commission has fewer employees than the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2020 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2016 12.8 2.6 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MI · Sanford

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 3 employers in Sanford, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roanoke, TX 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles Engineering, Inc 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeside Industries (050) 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concrete Profiles Inc. 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Solution Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE DBA FALKNER FARMS 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROB MAINTENANCE 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDL Energy 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCL Construction Co., Inc. 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanford 17 FTE
NAT-TCR Dallas Commissary 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta Air Lines - MS2 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 7093 - WP Riverside 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospice and Palliative Care of Iredell County 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE WCNOC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magnolia Marine Transport - Vicksburg 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE JW Acura LLC (AOP) 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hess Contracting, Inc. 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.