Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Florida

Midulla Generating Station

Bowling Green, FL · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midulla Generating Station runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Midulla Generating Station: 1.1 TCR = 95% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midulla Generating Station safety composite

Midulla Generating Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

Midulla Generating Station injury rate improved

Midulla Generating Station's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Bowling Green, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/43
  • PHOTO Valley Power Plant
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Valley Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Midulla Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midulla Generating Station averages 1.1 TCR (95% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midulla Generating Station TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Midulla Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 43 Electric power generation, fos employers in Florida.

Midulla Generating Station (32 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Midulla Generating Station
Midulla Generating Station (32 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Midulla Generating Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 0.0 0 1 0
2022 2.8 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · FL · Bowling Green

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 5 employers in Bowling Green, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Valley Power Plant 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Odessa-Ector Generating Station 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sycamore Cogeneration Facility 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAES : OM - Eagle Point 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hunt Bros Service 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tamiami Citrus, LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Osprey Energy Center 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FP1 Midway Service Center 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florikan ESA LLC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scosta Corp. Bowling Green 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ft. Green 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hardee Energy Center 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Justice Court Las Vegas 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Recycling American 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CLV 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Harris Arizona, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohio Valley Mall 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vcf 109 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asf 418 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asf 089 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.