Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Florida

Hardee Energy Center

Bowling Green, FL · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hardee Energy Center runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hardee Energy Center: 1.3 TCR = 111% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hardee Energy Center safety composite

Hardee Energy Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hardee Energy Center held a steady TCR band

Hardee Energy Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Bowling Green, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.3 · 111% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/43
  • PHOTO Miami Fort Power Sta…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miami Fort Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Hardee Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hardee Energy Center averages 1.3 TCR (111% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hardee Energy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Hardee Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 43 Electric power generation, fos employers in Florida.

Hardee Energy Center (26 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hardee Energy Center
Hardee Energy Center (26 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Hardee Energy Center has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.9 3.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.8 0.0 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · FL · Bowling Green

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 5 employers in Bowling Green, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miami Fort Power Station 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lamar Power Plant 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AES Warrior Run 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perryman 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cooperative Producers, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherrylake Inc. - VB 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAULING 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE J & J Sugar Harvesters Inc 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florikan ESA LLC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scosta Corp. Bowling Green 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midulla Generating Station 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ft. Green 32 FTE
NAT-TCR CompX National 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RCH Roofing Corporation 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Property, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedrock Finishing 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Desert View Power 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Protech Powder Coatings, Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittsburg Service Center 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Clair Shores Library 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.