Commercial printing (except screen, books) · Texas

Midway Press, Ltd.

Dallas, TX · ~123 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midway Press, Ltd. runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial printing (except screen, books) workplace, earning a grade D.

Midway Press, Ltd.: 4.7 TCR = 144% of Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midway Press, Ltd. safety composite

Midway Press, Ltd. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2016→2024

Midway Press, Ltd. injury rate improved

Midway Press, Ltd.'s TCR fell 8.1 from 8.8 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.8 · 2017=13.3 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 144% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #92/118
  • PHOTO 60_67
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 60_67 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Midway Press, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midway Press, Ltd. averages 4.7 TCR (144% of the Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midway Press, Ltd. TCR series: 2016=8.8 · 2017=13.3 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Midway Press, Ltd. falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial printing (except sc establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 118 Commercial printing (except sc employers in Texas.

Midway Press, Ltd. (123 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Midway Press, Ltd.
Midway Press, Ltd. (123 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Midway Press, Ltd. has more employees than the Commercial printing (except screen, book median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 2.1 0.7 3 0 0
2022 2.6 1.7 3 0 0
2021 3.4 0.8 4 0 0
2020 5.1 1.7 6 0 0
2019 4.4 3.5 5 0 0
2018 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2017 13.3 9.7 10 1 0
2016 8.8 2.6 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · TX · Dallas

2,001 Commercial printing (except screen, books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 60_67 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitchell Graphics 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Printograph, Inc., dba GotPrint.com - CA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Label and Marketing Services, LLC - LPA 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE USA Compression Partners - Gulf Coast 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longview Operations 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amarillo Technical Center A 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Austin Underground Inc. 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Airport Road 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Warrenville 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bowhead Marine Support Services 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JMS Russel Metals Corp - Trenton 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alvord-Polk, Inc. 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cypress Pointe Health Campus 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Willows at East Lansing 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lowes Foods #161 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.