Commercial printing (except screen, books) · Michigan

Mitchell Graphics

Petoskey, MI · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitchell Graphics runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial printing (except screen, books) workplace, earning a grade D.

Mitchell Graphics: 4.7 TCR = 143% of Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitchell Graphics safety composite

Mitchell Graphics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Mitchell Graphics injury rate improved

Mitchell Graphics's TCR fell 1.7 from 5.5 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Petoskey, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #40/55
  • PHOTO Printograph, Inc., d…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Printograph, Inc., dba GotPrint.com - CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Mitchell Graphics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitchell Graphics averages 4.7 TCR (143% of the Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitchell Graphics TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=6 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4 · 2022=7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Mitchell Graphics falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial printing (except sc establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 55 Commercial printing (except sc employers in Michigan.

Mitchell Graphics (32 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitchell Graphics
Mitchell Graphics (32 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Mitchell Graphics has fewer employees than the Commercial printing (except screen, book median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2023 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2021 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2016 5.5 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MI · Petoskey

2,001 Commercial printing (except screen, books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 50 employers in Petoskey, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Printograph, Inc., dba GotPrint.com - CA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Label and Marketing Services, LLC - LPA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midway Press, Ltd. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GENERAL DATA COMPANY 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6801_15743 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Soil Dairy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berrybrook 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tawas 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Northern Michigan 1,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Northern Michigan Hospital 1,155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Odawa Casino 509 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Staffing Services Corp. 483 FTE
NAT-TCR Mountainview Medical Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trucare Living Centers - Selma 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Darling Ingredients dba/DAR PRO Solutions 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maas Brothers Construction Co., Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Shore Surgical Specials 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie State Plumbing & Heating Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berns Landscaping 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spirit Lake Branch 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.