Precision turned product manufacturing · Minnesota

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc.

Hutchinson, MN · ~71 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Precision turned product manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Precision turned product manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. safety composite

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2017→2024

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. injury rate improved

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc.'s TCR fell 7.2 from 8.7 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332721 · Hutchinson, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO CPM Century Extrusion
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CPM Century Extrusion (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Precision turned product manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. falls in its industry

464 Precision turned product manuf establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Precision turned product manuf employers in Minnesota.

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc.
Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding, Inc. has more employees than the Precision turned product manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.7 1.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332721 · MN · Hutchinson

464 Precision turned product manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 78 employers in Hutchinson, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CPM Century Extrusion 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Necedah Screw Machine Products, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LMI - Wichita - Hillside 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kay Manufacturing Co. 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fagen, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donlar Construction Company 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanson Silo Company 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hutchinson 1,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0898 HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1738 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Agriculture 298 FTE
NAT-TCR Gilbarco Veeder-Root 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Clark/Sullivan Construction - California 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Primetals Technologies-Huger 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GSE Dynamics, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Specialty Machine 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Farmingdale, NJ 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFK 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE ICCS - Kendall 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.