Farm building construction · Nebraska

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC

Beatrice, NE · ~36 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Farm building construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC: 2.2 TCR = 75% of Farm building construction BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC safety composite

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC held a steady TCR band

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Beatrice, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 75% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/52
  • PHOTO Williams Restoration…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Williams Restoration & Waterproofing. Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC averages 2.2 TCR (75% of the Farm building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC falls in its industry

4,692 Farm building construction establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 52 Farm building construction employers in Nebraska.

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC (36 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC
Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC (36 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC has fewer employees than the Farm building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.9 0.0 3 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NE · Beatrice

4,692 Farm building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 34 employers in Beatrice, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Williams Restoration & Waterproofing. Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stovall Construction Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ScoCon LLS 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joeris General Contractors, Ltd. - Austin 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DNA Genetics 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy Center Omaha LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 102904 - MCC Fort Omaha Project 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE OTT Concrete Construction 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR BEATRICE 499 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exmark Manufacturing Co Inc 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neapco Components 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2784 268 FTE
NAT-TCR 1201 - Orange Park West 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HG402 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospitality & Real Estate: Destination Kohler 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Burnette Foods, Hartford 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ross Printing, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Engineering Company 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loyola Ctr for Health-Homer Glen 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyridge Farms 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.