Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Minnesota

Thomas Engineering Company

Brooklyn Park, MN · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thomas Engineering Company runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Thomas Engineering Company: 4.4 TCR = 134% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thomas Engineering Company safety composite

Thomas Engineering Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Thomas Engineering Company: 4.9 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Thomas Engineering Company's TCR rose 6.5 from 4.9 in 2018 to 11.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Brooklyn Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 134% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/27
  • PHOTO Industrial Solutions…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Auburn, ME (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Thomas Engineering Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thomas Engineering Company averages 4.4 TCR (134% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thomas Engineering Company TCR series: 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=11.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Thomas Engineering Company falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 27 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Minnesota.

Thomas Engineering Company (36 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Thomas Engineering Company
Thomas Engineering Company (36 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Thomas Engineering Company has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.5 0.0 1 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · MN · Brooklyn Park

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 226 employers in Brooklyn Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Auburn, ME 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Resource Inc 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Troy 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KMC Stampings - Mineral Springs 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prairie Moon Nursery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.) 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0591 - Target Northern Campus 5,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMRG 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Services 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Egan Company 962 FTE
NAT-TCR 60 - Arlington Heights 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Line Equipment - Towanda 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Manhattan 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sauk Prairie Healthcare - Lodi Clinic 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Skyridge Farms 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross Printing, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Livestock Systems, LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loyola Ctr for Health-Homer Glen 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.