Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers · Missouri

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc.

Kansas City, MO · ~121 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc.: 3.4 TCR = 154% of Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. safety composite

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2019→2023

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. injury rate improved

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.6 from 4.1 in 2019 to 2.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Kansas City, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 154% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #20/37
  • PHOTO Phenix City
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phenix City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. averages 3.4 TCR (154% of the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. TCR series: 2019=4.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. falls in its industry

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 37 Metal scrap and waste merchant employers in Missouri.

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. (121 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Scrap Management, Inc.
Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. (121 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Midwest Scrap Management, Inc. has more employees than the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesale median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 1.9 4 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2021 3.6 2.9 5 0 0
2020 3.9 3.1 5 0 0
2019 4.1 2.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · MO · Kansas City

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phenix City 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Scrap Metals, Inc 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solomon Metals Corp. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRG a Division of Alter Trading 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BJC - Medical Center Campus Renewal 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Kansas City 2 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper Kansas City Container 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valcour - St. Louis 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Allstate Peterbilt of Rochester 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (PXH-6368) 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Long Branch Nj 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Piedmont Grocery Company 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE ABCM Corporation 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (MEMU-6434) 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0074 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE UT011 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.