Medical care management services · Minnesota

Midwest Stone Management

Roseville, MN · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Stone Management runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Medical care management services workplace, earning a grade A.

Midwest Stone Management: 1.5 TCR = 40% of Medical care management services BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Stone Management safety composite

Midwest Stone Management scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Midwest Stone Management held a steady TCR band

Midwest Stone Management's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621999 · Roseville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Everest Care Managem…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Everest Care Management (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Stone Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Stone Management averages 1.5 TCR (40% of the Medical care management services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Stone Management TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=4 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Midwest Stone Management falls in its industry

461 Medical care management servic establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Medical care management servic employers in Minnesota.

Midwest Stone Management (26 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Stone Management
Midwest Stone Management (26 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Midwest Stone Management has fewer employees than the Medical care management services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621999 · MN · Roseville

461 Medical care management services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Everest Care Management 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5107 - AZ Pima County - PCADC - NaphCare AZ LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8101-Atrium Health Foundation (8101) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Line Screening 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Becker 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Silverstreak Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Huiras MN 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Egg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwest Service Group 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bartch Roofing Co., Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WOM - Subsea 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Century Construction Company, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Scott A Duncan, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross & Sons Refrigeration & Construction 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Bernardino Plant #12 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Weber RMC 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.