Animal feeds, prepared, dog and cat, manufacturing · Indiana

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc.

Evansville, IN · ~89 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Animal feeds, prepared, dog and cat, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 80% of Animal feeds, prepared, dog and cat, manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. safety composite

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2017→2024

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. injury rate improved

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.6 from 3.5 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311111 · Evansville, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #8/13
  • PHOTO Wellness Pet Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wellness Pet Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (80% of the Animal feeds, prepared, dog and cat, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=6 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.9

Where Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. falls in its industry

302 Animal feeds, prepared, dog an establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 13 Animal feeds, prepared, dog an employers in Indiana.

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. (89 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 103 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc.
Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. (89 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 103 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. has fewer employees than the Animal feeds, prepared, dog and cat, man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.0 1.0 6 0 0
2021 4.4 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 8.3 6.6 5 0 0
2017 3.5 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311111 · IN · Evansville

302 Animal feeds, prepared, dog and cat, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 489 employers in Evansville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wellness Pet Company 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diamond Pet Foods - Dumas AR 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ravenna 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nestle Purina PetCare- Zanesville 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Indiana Laborers 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harmon Construction 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 10 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE construction - glass/glazing 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Midtown 3,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global - Evansville, IN (Oakley Str.) 2,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 2,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Merchants, LLC 1,859 FTE
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Sweetwater 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Keeley & Sons, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR S09217 - Houston Street MRF 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ericstad, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cozy Harbor Seafood 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Halliday Products Inc 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE WRH, Inc. 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.