Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Kansas

Mies Construction, Inc.

Wichita, KS · ~108 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mies Construction, Inc. runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Mies Construction, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 89% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mies Construction, Inc. safety composite

Mies Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2024

Mies Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

Mies Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 4.3 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Wichita, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 89% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO MA Long Construction…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MA Long Construction Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Mies Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mies Construction, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (89% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mies Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2 · BLS 2.8

Where Mies Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Kansas.

Mies Construction, Inc. (108 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mies Construction, Inc.
Mies Construction, Inc. (108 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Mies Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.4 3 0 0
2023 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2022 2.1 1.4 3 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 4 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2018 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · KS · Wichita

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MA Long Construction Office 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AJA Construction Services, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR VS - IL 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conway 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rush Center 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Revere Plastics Systems - McPherson 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE 615-00092 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR ASM Knoxville 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Insulation Contractors/Magellan Insulation 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kobelco Compressors Manufacturing Indiana Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Avanti Polar Lipids 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE REB Solutions INC 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Old Dominion Abatement and Demolition, LLC - VA 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wiese Brothers Farms 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accurate Insulation Upper Marlboro 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.