Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song

Onamia, MN · ~24 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song: 11.5 TCR = 303% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song safety composite

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2020→2024

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song injury rate improved

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song's TCR fell 5.6 from 12.8 in 2020 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=12.8 · 2021=14.6 · 2022=23.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Onamia, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 303% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #156/226
  • PHOTO Arden Courts of San …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arden Courts of San Antonio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song averages 11.5 TCR (303% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song TCR series: 2020=12.8 · 2021=14.6 · 2022=23 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #156 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song (24 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song
Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song (24 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 23.0 23.0 0 3 0
2021 14.6 14.6 0 2 0
2020 12.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Onamia

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 13 employers in Onamia, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of San Antonio 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Atrium 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silvercrest at Deer Creek 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Cottonwood Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPI-Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Services - Jackson 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Repairs and Maintenance 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mille Lacs Health System Hospital 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mille Lacs Health System - Hospital 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mille Lacs Health System - Long Term Care 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Onamia Elementary School 57 FTE
NAT-TCR 5 Star Plumbing 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Elkhart Office 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WAS027 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD013 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blue Skies Electric, LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reinders-Mundelein 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wallwork Truck Center Dickinson 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curtis Electric, Inc. 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.