Retirement Living Center--Health Care Employees · Florida

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center

Palm Harbor, FL · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement Living Center--Health Care Employees workplace, earning a grade F.

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center: 11.5 TCR = 303% of Retirement Living Center--Health Care Employees BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center safety composite

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center: 11.3 → 18.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 18.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2020

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center's TCR rose 6.9 from 11.3 in 2017 to 18.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Palm Harbor, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 303% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #231/283
  • PHOTO Mille Lacs Health Sy…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center averages 11.5 TCR (303% of the Retirement Living Center--Health Care Employees BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center TCR series: 2017=11.3 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=18.2 · BLS 3.8

Where St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement Living Center--Heal establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #231 safest of 283 Retirement Living Center--Heal employers in Florida.

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center (51 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center
St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center (51 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

St. Mark Village Assisted Living Center has fewer employees than the Retirement Living Center--Health Care Em median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 18.2 6.1 9 3 0
2019 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 14.1 9.4 6 0 0
2017 11.3 9.0 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Palm Harbor

4,127 Retirement Living Center--Health Care Employees employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 37 employers in Palm Harbor, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of San Antonio 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Atrium 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silvercrest at Deer Creek 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CGC Agri-Management Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillip Rucks Citrus Nursery, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Training Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Walton District Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR North County Service Center 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Pinellas Care Center 2,130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palm Harbor Community Service Center 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salamander Innisbrook, LLC 508 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercy Health Oakwood Village 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison Office - 363 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dixon Facility 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Havenwood Block 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Comfort Systems USA Indiana 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darigold Jerome 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Stone Veneer Inc., Tower City Manufacturing 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Lighting Concepts, LLC. 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.