Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Michigan

Miller-Davis Company

Kalamazoo, MI · ~49 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Miller-Davis Company runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Miller-Davis Company: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Miller-Davis Company safety composite

Miller-Davis Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2022

Miller-Davis Company injury rate improved

Miller-Davis Company's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Kalamazoo, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/121
  • PHOTO Spring Valley Constr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spring Valley Construction Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Miller-Davis Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Miller-Davis Company averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Miller-Davis Company TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Miller-Davis Company falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 121 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Michigan.

Miller-Davis Company (49 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Miller-Davis Company
Miller-Davis Company (49 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Miller-Davis Company has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MI · Kalamazoo

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 353 employers in Kalamazoo, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spring Valley Construction Company 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR sbi Field Operations 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Path Construction Central, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDS Builders, Inc. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1003 Canal St 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gundlach Champion, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLOSNER CONSTRUCTION & SALES INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE DiPonio Contracting LLC 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bronson Methodist Hospital 4,909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Kalamazoo - Portage Road 3,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Instruments 2,240 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIKAL1 2,103 FTE
NAT-TCR Energy Absorption Systems, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bshsi Maryview 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McDowell Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambria Hotel & Suites 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Firststeps for Kids Ventura 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Underground Company 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE DSI Holdings Corporation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holt and Bugbee Hardwoods 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.