Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Minnesota

Minneapolis

New Hope, MN · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minneapolis runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Minneapolis: 5.8 TCR = 175% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minneapolis safety composite

Minneapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2022→2024

Minneapolis injury rate improved

Minneapolis's TCR fell 2.5 from 6.5 in 2022 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.5 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · New Hope, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 175% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #17/29
  • PHOTO Chromium Plating Com…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chromium Plating Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minneapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minneapolis averages 5.8 TCR (175% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minneapolis TCR series: 2022=6.5 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Minneapolis falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 29 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Minnesota.

Minneapolis (61 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Minneapolis
Minneapolis (61 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Minneapolis has more employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 4 0 0
2022 6.5 2.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MN · New Hope

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 95 employers in New Hope, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chromium Plating Company 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AaCron Anodizing 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenwood Fabricating and Plating 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pentagon Technologies NY 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gittleman Construction and Maintenance 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE R and G Construction Co. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLK ELECTRIC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cresco Food Technologies 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Therese of New Hope 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horwitz, Inc 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hope - Main Store 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Education Center 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Utslk - Salt Lake Airport 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sierra Pacific Industries 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Cattle Company 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Point of Beverly Hills 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohlan - Lancaster 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wycod - Cody 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nmala - Alamogordo 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbly - Blytheville 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.