Other Support Activities for Air Transportation · Utah

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport

Salt Lake City, UT · ~124 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Other Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport: 5.8 TCR = 128% of Other Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport safety composite

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2019→2024

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport injury rate improved

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport's TCR fell 9.4 from 9.4 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.4 · 2020=16.6 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 128% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/14
  • PHOTO John Bean Technologi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: John Bean Technologies Corporation BNA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utslk - Salt Lake Airport averages 5.8 TCR (128% of the Other Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport TCR series: 2019=9.4 · 2020=16.6 · 2021=5 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Utslk - Salt Lake Airport falls in its industry

992 Other Support Activities for A establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 14 Other Support Activities for A employers in Utah.

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport (124 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Utslk - Salt Lake Airport
Utslk - Salt Lake Airport (124 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Utslk - Salt Lake Airport has more employees than the Other Support Activities for Air Transpo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2020 16.6 13.3 10 0 0
2019 9.4 7.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · UT · Salt Lake City

992 Other Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR John Bean Technologies Corporation BNA 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duncan Aviation 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LASPW9600 LAS - OVERHEAD 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Star Aviation / Grand Junction 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Rifle Coffee Company 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE PARC Hill AFB Janitorial (8600) 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deseret Power Plant 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE ST GEORGE 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Sierra Pacific Industries 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Minneapolis 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Point of Beverly Hills 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stock Yards Spokane 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ny700 - Palisades 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ctnia - Niantic 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robertson Heating Supply Co. of Ohio 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE DuPont Pencader Plant 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.