Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Minnehaha Senior Living

Minneapolis, MN · ~52 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnehaha Senior Living runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Minnehaha Senior Living: 10.1 TCR = 265% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnehaha Senior Living safety composite

Minnehaha Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Minnehaha Senior Living: 8.5 → 25.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 25.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2024

Minnehaha Senior Living's TCR rose 16.8 from 8.5 in 2018 to 25.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 265% of ind

  • DART 14.1 DART
  • RANK #140/226
  • PHOTO Residential Care Man…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Residential Care Management (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnehaha Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnehaha Senior Living averages 10.1 TCR (265% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnehaha Senior Living TCR series: 2018=8.5 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.5 · 2024=25.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Minnehaha Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #140 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Minnehaha Senior Living (52 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnehaha Senior Living
Minnehaha Senior Living (52 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Minnehaha Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 25.3 14.1 9 0 0
2021 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.1 9.1 3 0 0
2018 8.5 8.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Minneapolis

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Residential Care Management 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turners Rock Senior Living 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elk River Senior Living 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Montebello on Academy FSQ Inc 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hutchinson Utilities Commission 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasella Concrete, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bargen Incorporated 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheehy Construction Company 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Aperion Care Wilmington 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Morningside House of St. Charles 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 210 Burlingame 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SpringHill Suites Lakeland FL 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shawnee Estates Senior Living 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartwell 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarksville Operations Center 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bloomington Operations Center 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.