Skilled nursing facilities · Minnesota

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC

Waite Park, MN · ~52 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC runs at 287% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC: 18.6 TCR = 287% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC safety composite

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2018→2024

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC injury rate improved

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC's TCR fell 2.2 from 10.0 in 2018 to 7.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 38.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.0 · 2022=38.6 · 2023=18.3 · 2024=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Waite Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.6 · 287% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #390/430
  • PHOTO Thrive of Lake County
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thrive of Lake County (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC averages 18.6 TCR (287% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC TCR series: 2018=10 · 2022=38.6 · 2023=18.3 · 2024=7.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #390 safest of 430 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Minnesota.

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC (52 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC
Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC (52 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Sterling Park Healthcare Center INC has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.7 7.7 1 1 0
2023 18.3 18.3 1 7 0
2022 38.6 36.4 2 16 0
2018 10.0 2.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Waite Park

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 82 employers in Waite Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thrive of Lake County 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hartwell Health and Rehabilitation 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington Center 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cheyenne Mountain Care Center 18.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hutchinson Utilities Commission 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasella Concrete, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bargen Incorporated 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheehy Construction Company 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR WACOSA 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bernicks Pepsi & Chas A Bernick of St Cloud 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buttweiler Environmental, Inc. 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buttweiler Environmental, Inc. Corporate Office 247 FTE
NAT-TCR Harris Door and Millwork 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlingame 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Guilford Fire Department 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR FRHC - Spokane/INW 18.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dodge City 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big T Supermarket Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE JONDO LTD - Grand Prairie, TX 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Saginaw Paving Co. 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.