Correctional institutions · Minnesota

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing

Red Wing, MN · ~185 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing runs at 382% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing: 12.2 TCR = 382% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing safety composite

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 30% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2024

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing injury rate improved

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing's TCR fell 2.3 from 9.1 in 2017 to 6.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 43.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.1 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=43.9 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Red Wing, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.2 · 382% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #24/32
  • PHOTO Earnest C Brooks Cor…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~185 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Earnest C Brooks Correctional Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing averages 12.2 TCR (382% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing TCR series: 2017=9.1 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=7 · 2022=43.9 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 32 Correctional institutions employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing (185 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing
Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing (185 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Minnesota Correctional Facility - Red Wing has fewer employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 5.5 11 0 0
2023 7.6 5.7 12 0 0
2022 43.9 41.2 12 54 0
2021 7.0 5.7 2 9 1
2020 14.6 12.7 10 13 0
2019 6.3 6.3 10 0 0
2018 2.6 0.6 4 0 0
2017 9.1 4.5 12 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MN · Red Wing

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 68 employers in Red Wing, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Earnest C Brooks Correctional Facility 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR High Desert State Prison - 934 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SILVERDALE 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Department of Corrections 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE East Central Energy 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Installed Building Solutions #450 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1685 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Graco Inc. - French Lake 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Red Wing 606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing Sala 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing, MN 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Wing Shoe Co. - Plant 2 418 FTE
NAT-TCR TXD068 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR WAS014 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Owensboro, LLC--Hermitage 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Burbank- Police - Communications 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vista Loc 1655 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Future Plastering, Inc 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillcrest Physician Services 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Packaging Inc Port Allen LA 185 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.