Correctional institutions · Minnesota

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office

St. Paul, MN · ~397 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade A.

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office: 0.4 TCR = 11% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office safety composite

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

85/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2018

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office injury rate improved

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/32
  • PHOTO 701, 742, 756, 766, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~397 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 701, 742, 756, 766, and 767 Corrections Administration (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 32 Correctional institutions employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office (397 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office
Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office (397 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Minnesota Department of Corrections - Central Office has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.7 0.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MN · St. Paul

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 701, 742, 756, 766, and 767 Corrections Administration 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wise Correctional Unit #18 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KIT CARSON 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Department of Corrections-Phoenix/ 1831 Bldg 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mavo Systems, Inc. 397 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delano ISD #879 397 FTE
STATE-SIZE ISD 284 Wayzata Schools Wayzata High School 397 FTE
STATE-SIZE API Construction 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR YCID 5,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM 5,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Hospital 3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR IT Campus 2,409 FTE
NAT-TCR Goodrich - Customer Service 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DynaEnergetics US Inc. (Blum) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR UTC Aerospace Systems Major Business Unit 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Arthur Refinery 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cordova (Casmt) 397 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ups National Turnpike (Kynat) 397 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville (Scgrv) 397 FTE
NAT-SIZE VINNVABM 397 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.