Environmental health program administration · Minnesota

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule

St Paul, MN · ~588 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Environmental health program administration workplace, earning a grade A.

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Environmental health program administration BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule safety composite

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule held a steady TCR band

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.9 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.9 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · St Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/29
  • PHOTO Health & Human Servi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~588 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Health & Human Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Environmental health program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule falls in its industry

267 Environmental health program a establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 29 Environmental health program a employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule (588 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule
Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule (588 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Minnesota Department of Health - Golden Rule has more employees than the Environmental health program administrat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.6 0.0 3 0 0
2018 0.6 0.4 3 0 0
2017 0.9 0.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · MN · St Paul

267 Environmental health program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Health & Human Services 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMHS - Cianchette 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Jersey Mental Health Association 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wingspan Care Group - Shaker 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Land O'Lakes, Inc. Shoreview 588 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monticello High School 588 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Inver Grove Heights 588 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smithfield Foods 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR GLOENCO South Carolina 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Adrian Steel of Maryland, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maysville Mill 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NGTS-Q550 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harbor Health Services, Inc. 588 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manheim Nashville 588 FTE
NAT-SIZE LBrands - Morse Campus 588 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terra Bella Plant 588 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.