Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing · Minnesota

Minnetonka, MN, USA

Minnetonka, MN · ~472 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnetonka, MN, USA runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Minnetonka, MN, USA: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnetonka, MN, USA safety composite

Minnetonka, MN, USA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2018

Minnetonka, MN, USA injury rate improved

Minnetonka, MN, USA's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.9 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2018=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Minnetonka, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #6/12
  • PHOTO Gudel, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~472 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gudel, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnetonka, MN, USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnetonka, MN, USA averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnetonka, MN, USA TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Minnetonka, MN, USA falls in its industry

242 Filters, industrial and genera establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 12 Filters, industrial and genera employers in Minnesota.

Minnetonka, MN, USA (472 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnetonka, MN, USA
Minnetonka, MN, USA (472 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Minnetonka, MN, USA has more employees than the Filters, industrial and general line (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.5 1.1 7 0 0
2017 1.9 1.5 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · MN · Minnetonka

242 Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 179 employers in Minnetonka, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gudel, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Rancho Bernardo - G95 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gagne Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gooch and Housego (Keene) LLC 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Operations - Detroit Lakes, MN 472 FTE
STATE-SIZE Suez Water Technologies & Solutions Minntonka 472 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sysco Minnesota 472 FTE
STATE-SIZE MPLSMNDF - AT&T Services, Inc. 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN008 1,873 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Marsh 1,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN006 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN006 MINNETONKA-9800 HEALTH CARE LN 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercy Health Physicians North 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BCS Enterprises, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HQ 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dayton CPC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Department of Social Services - Greensboro 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE Behavioral Heath Works, Anaheim, Inc 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philips NAM Alpharetta, GA 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE DuBois Chemicals (Sharonville) 472 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.