Skilled nursing facilities · Texas

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Mission, TX · ~113 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 181% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 11.7 TCR = 181% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 6.8 → 19.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 271.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 13.0 from 6.8 in 2016 to 19.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 271.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mission, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 11.7 · 181% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #986/1034
  • PHOTO Lone Tree Retirement…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lone Tree Retirement Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 11.7 TCR (181% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=7 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=50.9 · 2021=24.7 · 2022=271.7 · 2024=19.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #986 safest of 1034 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Texas.

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (113 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (113 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.8 4.0 10 0 0
2022 271.7 240.8 5 39 0
2021 24.7 24.7 0 4 0
2020 50.9 50.9 3 43 0
2019 4.8 0.0 5 0 0
2018 7.0 6.1 8 0 0
2017 7.3 5.8 10 0 0
2016 6.8 4.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Mission

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 47 employers in Mission, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lone Tree Retirement Center 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Hills Rehabilitation Center 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Narraguagus Bay Health Care Facility 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belle Haven Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bar-g Feedyard 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flying A Pumping Services LLC, 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Operations 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE 112855-CPCHEM LDPE 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX McAllen 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX-Mission Call Center 908 FTE
CITY-NEAR MISSION REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Wonderful Company 560 FTE
NAT-TCR Lone Tree Retirement Center 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PIAD Precision Casting 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Double Aught Lumber 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MEC Inc 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rocklin 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Squared 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Topeka Foundry & Iron Works 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lloyd W. Aubry Co., Inc 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.