Water distribution (except irrigation) · California

Mission Springs Water District

Desert Hot Springs, CA · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mission Springs Water District runs at 777% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water distribution (except irrigation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Mission Springs Water District: 9.3 TCR = 777% of Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mission Springs Water District safety composite

Mission Springs Water District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2022→2024

Mission Springs Water District injury rate improved

Mission Springs Water District's TCR fell 1.0 from 9.2 in 2022 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=9.2 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Desert Hot Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 777% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #150/176
  • PHOTO Meter Shop
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meter Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mission Springs Water District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mission Springs Water District averages 9.3 TCR (777% of the Water distribution (except irrigation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mission Springs Water District TCR series: 2022=9.2 · 2023=10.7 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Mission Springs Water District falls in its industry

727 Water distribution (except irr establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 176 Water distribution (except irr employers in California.

Mission Springs Water District (51 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mission Springs Water District
Mission Springs Water District (51 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Mission Springs Water District has fewer employees than the Water distribution (except irrigation) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 2.0 3 1 1
2023 10.7 6.4 4 1 0
2022 9.2 6.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Desert Hot Springs

727 Water distribution (except irrigation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 15 employers in Desert Hot Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meter Shop 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DWM-Mayfair Pumping Station | 4850 W. Wilson 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Winsted 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BWS-Heeia 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Med for America Inc. 516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gold Flora Corp 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR JRNL Two Bunch Palms LLC 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Journal Two Bunch Palms 108 FTE
NAT-TCR Faircloth Welding and Fabrication, Inc. d/b/a LJR Forest Products 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmonic Hot Tubs 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lansing South Mi - 3158 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Bakery Products 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Regulated Fossil Support 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Herr Foods - 069 Oakland NJ 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Subaru of North Tampa 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avient Minneapolis 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.