Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Montana

Mission Valley Power

Pablo, MT · ~73 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mission Valley Power runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Mission Valley Power: 4.0 TCR = 142% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mission Valley Power safety composite

Mission Valley Power scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mission Valley Power held a steady TCR band

Mission Valley Power's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.5 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=8.0 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Pablo, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 142% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO ANS:ANMAR - ANMAR - …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ANS:ANMAR - ANMAR - Marietta, GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Mission Valley Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mission Valley Power averages 4.0 TCR (142% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mission Valley Power TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=8 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Mission Valley Power falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Montana.

Mission Valley Power (73 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mission Valley Power
Mission Valley Power (73 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Mission Valley Power has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2021 5.1 3.4 3 0 0
2020 8.0 6.7 6 0 0
2019 5.1 5.1 3 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2016 3.5 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MT · Pablo

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ANS:ANMAR - ANMAR - Marietta, GA 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henkels & McCoy, Florida - Jacksonville 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific West Space Communications, Inc. 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Williams Civil Construction 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant Services inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lithia Toyota of Billings 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6400-SWY 0031 3279 73 FTE
NAT-TCR Erie 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Providence Performing Arts Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New Horizons Enterprises, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Service Electric Co. Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Warsaw Facility 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Oak LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Wood Products 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Cooling Tower Services, Inc 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.