Construction management, power and communication transmission line · California

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse

Corona, CA · ~97 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade D.

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse: 4.0 TCR = 143% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse safety composite

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse held a steady TCR band

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=15.0 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Corona, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #92/147
  • PHOTO Mission Valley Power
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mission Valley Power (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse averages 4.0 TCR (143% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=15 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 147 Construction management, power employers in California.

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse (97 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse
Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse (97 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse has more employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 15.0 12.0 10 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Corona

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mission Valley Power 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NSC:NSK11 - NSK11-North Sky - Sherwood, OR 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANS:ANMAR - ANMAR - Marietta, GA 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henkels & McCoy, Florida - Jacksonville 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grapeman Farms 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Varsity Packing, Inc 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westland Floral Company Carpinteria, Inc. 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOS ANGELES RESERVOIR 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Glovis America- VPC MA 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace-Saginaw Paving Co. North Division 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridgefield Golf Course 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 08 - Aurora 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ken Garner Manufacturing - CHO 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE USCS- Lebanon, IN 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forum Energy Technologies - 2005 Garden Rd. 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.