Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums · Alabama

Mitchell Container Services

Saraland, AL · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitchell Container Services runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums workplace, earning a grade C.

Mitchell Container Services: 2.3 TCR = 108% of Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitchell Container Services safety composite

Mitchell Container Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mitchell Container Services: 0.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.85× in 2024

Mitchell Container Services's TCR rose 4.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Saraland, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 108% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #37/56
  • PHOTO Crown Lift Trucks Mi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Lift Trucks Milwaukee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Mitchell Container Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitchell Container Services averages 2.3 TCR (108% of the Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitchell Container Services TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=4 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Mitchell Container Services falls in its industry

2,560 Reconditioning shipping barrel establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 56 Reconditioning shipping barrel employers in Alabama.

Mitchell Container Services (25 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitchell Container Services
Mitchell Container Services (25 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Mitchell Container Services has fewer employees than the Reconditioning shipping barrels and drum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2022 8.3 4.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · AL · Saraland

2,560 Reconditioning shipping barrels and drums employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 37 employers in Saraland, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Milwaukee 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wartsila North America Inc. - Houston 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arizona Electrical Apparatus Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontier Ag & Turf, Osceola 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Franklin Electric Cooperattive 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE NextGen Industrial, LLC. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tutwiler Residence Hall 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 250 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alorica 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1212 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1212 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC11 266 FTE
NAT-TCR Community Services 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Berwyn Store 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Knauf Insulation Plant 1 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #8 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vcf 112 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Charles 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michael L. Shular D/B/A La Quinta Inn 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kentucky Oaks Mall 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.