Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Florida

MiTek, Inc. - Largo

Largo, FL · ~70 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MiTek, Inc. - Largo runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

MiTek, Inc. - Largo: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MiTek, Inc. - Largo safety composite

MiTek, Inc. - Largo scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MiTek, Inc. - Largo held a steady TCR band

MiTek, Inc. - Largo's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.8 in 2019 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.8 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Largo, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Unistrut Internation…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Unistrut International Corporation - Wayne Operation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

MiTek, Inc. - Largo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MiTek, Inc. - Largo averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MiTek, Inc. - Largo TCR series: 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where MiTek, Inc. - Largo falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Florida.

MiTek, Inc. - Largo (70 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MiTek, Inc. - Largo
MiTek, Inc. - Largo (70 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

MiTek, Inc. - Largo has more employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.7 0.0 4 0 0
2021 3.2 0.0 2 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.8 0.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · FL · Largo

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 165 employers in Largo, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Unistrut International Corporation - Wayne Operation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rittal North America LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DWK Life Sciences Closure Systems, LLC. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seastrom Mfg. Co. Inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parkesdale Farms Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAINBROOK FARMS 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broward Service Center 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Toledo Blade Service Center 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR BayCare Home Care Medical Supply (7251) 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA FLORIDA LARGO HOSPITAL 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Largo Medical Center 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conmed - Largo 1,021 FTE
NAT-TCR Landscape Management Company 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AZP010 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR NC Monroe 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Evapco Midwest 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pierce Machinery & Wire, Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flash Global Logistics - OH 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE EW Merritt Farms 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Paul BNSF 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.