Chemical milling job shops · Arizona

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ

Mesa, AZ · ~158 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chemical milling job shops workplace, earning a grade A.

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Chemical milling job shops BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ safety composite

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ held a steady TCR band

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332710 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/18
  • PHOTO Rankin
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rankin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Chemical milling job shops BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ falls in its industry

1,821 Chemical milling job shops establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 18 Chemical milling job shops employers in Arizona.

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ (158 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ
Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ (158 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials AZ has more employees than the Chemical milling job shops median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332710 · AZ · Mesa

1,821 Chemical milling job shops employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rankin 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Antron Engineering & Machine Co., Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Praxair Surface Technologies, Inc. TAFA Division 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR REBCO, Inc 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chandler Line 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jenco, Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buesing Corppration 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duro Bag - Tolleson 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Portsmouth Dist 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CVRx, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell - Plant 3 - CDC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR R.A.D. Fabrication, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jewish Community Care at Home 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Athens 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bharat Forge PMT 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Cooling 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.