Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing · California

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

Name: M&M Printed Bag, Inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Chino, CA · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.1
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 64% of Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. safety composite

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2017→2018

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. injury rate improved

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.2 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326111 · Chino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 64% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #2/21
PHOTO Cary (formerly Ampac…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cary (formerly Ampac Flexicon, LLC) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.1
Cary (formerly

2.1
Berry Plastics

2.1
Berrygos

2.1
Automated Pack

2.1

What this shows M&M Printed Bag, Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (64% of the Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where M&M Printed Bag, Inc. falls in its industry

322 Food storage bags, plastics fi establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 21 Food storage bags, plastics fi employers in California.

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. has fewer employees than the Food storage bags, plastics film, single median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2017	4.2	4.2	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326111 · CA · Chino

322 Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Cary (formerly Ampac Flexicon, LLC)	CARY, IL	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Berry Plastics Bloomington	BLOOMINGTON, IN	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Berrygos	GOSHEN, IN	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Automated Packaging Systems - Bedford	BEDFORD HEIGHTS, OH	2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	ARVIN PRODUCTION & ADMIN	ARVIN	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rava Business Park	KING CITY	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Guerrero Transportation & Contracting Inc	BAKERSFIELD	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	VPS, Inc	PASO ROBLES	48 FTE
CITY-NEAR	4078	Chino	2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR	8103	Chino	2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 4078	Chino	1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Institution for Men	Chino	1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR	Jackson Emc - Neese	Hull, GA	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Brookdale Burr Ridge	Burr Rudge, IL	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cardinal Health Inc.	Peabody, MA	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Craftsman Plating & Tinning	Chicago, IL	2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Main Office	Waukesha, WI	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	F/T Constellation	Seattle, WA	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	F/T Defender	Seattle, WA	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Camco	Ebensburg, PA	48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.